University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Selective hearing: The gendered construction and reception of Inquiry evidence

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-18, 05:46 authored by Cook, K, Natalier, K
In this paper we present a case study of the gendering of evidence in family policy reform. We examine the characterisation of data as legitimate or illegitimate in a recent Australian Inquiry into child support and custody issues. Using critical discourse analysis, we examine how Inquiry committee members interpreted personal anecdotes and social scientific data presented by witnesses. Data were characterised as legitimate when confirming an existing stock story of fathers’ disadvantage in an unfair child support system; these data were treated as evidence of a widespread social problem. Data that challenged the stock story were rejected as offering an inappropriate basis for policy reform. We conclude that in these reforms, the type of data, be it social scientific or anecdotal, was not as important as its alignment with a priori understandings of the nature of the world and the policy problems to be solved.

History

Publication title

Critical Social Policy

Volume

34

Issue

4

Pagination

515-537

ISSN

0261-0183

Department/School

School of Social Sciences

Publisher

Sage Publications Ltd

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Rights statement

Copyright 2014 The Authors Sage Publications

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Government and politics not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC