University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-17, 16:53 authored by Butchart, SHM, Walpole, M, Collen, B, Van Strien, A, Scharlemann, JPW, Almond, REA, Baillie, JEM, Bomhard, B, Brown, C, Bruno, J, Carpenter, KE, Carr, GM, Chanson, J, Chenery, AM, Csirke, J, Davidson, NC, Dentener, F, Foster, M, Galli, A, Galloway, JN, Genovesi, P, Gregory, RD, Hockings, M, Kapos, V, Lamarque, J-F, Leverington, F, Loh, J, McGeoch, MA, McRae, L, Minasyan, A, Morcillo, MH, Oldfield, TEE, Pauly, D, Quader, S, Revenga, C, Sauer, JR, Skolnik, B, Spear, D, Stanwell-Smith, D, Stuart, SN, Symes, A, Tierney, M, Tyrrell, TD, Vie, J-C, Reginald WatsonReginald Watson
In 2002, world leaders committed, through the Convention on Biological Diversity, to achieve a significant reduction in the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. We compiled 31 indicators to report on progress toward this target. Most indicators of the state of biodiversity (covering species' population trends, extinction risk, habitat extent and condition, and community composition) showed declines, with no significant recent reductions in rate, whereas indicators of pressures on biodiversity (including resource consumption, invasive alien species, nitrogen pollution, overexploitation, and climate change impacts) showed increases. Despite some local successes and increasing responses (including extent and biodiversity coverage of protected areas, sustainable forest management, policy responses to invasive alien species, and biodiversity-related aid), the rate of biodiversity loss does not appear to be slowing.

History

Publication title

Science

Volume

328

Issue

5982

Pagination

1164-1168

ISSN

0036-8075

Department/School

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies

Publisher

American Association for Advancement of Science

Place of publication

United States

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Wild caught fin fish (excl. tuna)