eCite Digital Repository

Vertical distributions of iron-(III) complexing ligands in the Southern Ocean


Ibisanmi, E and Sander, SG and Boyd, PW and Bowie, AR and Hunter, KA, Vertical distributions of iron-(III) complexing ligands in the Southern Ocean, Deep-Sea Research. Part 2: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 58, (21-22) pp. 2113-2125. ISSN 0967-0645 (2011) [Refereed Article]

Restricted - Request a copy

Copyright Statement

The definitive version is available at

DOI: doi:10.1016/j.dsr2.2011.05.028


Electrochemically derived iron speciation data from four vertical profiles to 1000 m depth were obtained during the SAZ-Sense voyage to offshore waters south of Australia in summer (January/February, 2007). The dual aims of this study were firstly to devise a new operational definition to represent the 'complexing capacity', or total concentration of iron-complexing ligands, and subsequently derive vertical profiles of these ligand classes. Secondly, to compare the vertical trends for each ligand class with vertical distributions in oceanic properties thought to control ligand production (i.e. siderophores produced by bacteria and particle remineralisation). Based on simulated ligand titrations, we operationally defined ΣL as the overall class of ligands, which represents all iron-complexing ligands detectable under the analytical conditions chosen. The stability constant of ΣL is a weighted average for these ligands. The ligand titration data suggests the presence of an excess of iron-complexing ligands throughout the water column with an average concentration of [ΣL] = 0.75 ± 0.20 nM (n = 47), and an average stability constant of log KFeSL,Fe3+ ≥ 21.50 ± 0.24 (n = 47). Here, based on the range of observed stability constants we define a distinctly different class of extremely strong ligands (L1) to be the ligand class with a stability constant of log KFeL1,Fe3+ ≥ 22, whereas ΣL ranged from 21.00 to 21.95 for log KFeL1,Fe3+. L1 had an average concentration and stability constant of 0.42 ± 0.10 nM (n = 14) and 22.97 ± 0.48 (n = 14), respectively. L1 was only found in three of the four depth profiles, and was restricted to the upper ocean (i.e. < 200 m depth), whereas ΣL was observed at all sampling depths down to 1000 m. Heterotrophic bacterial abundances (a proxy for siderophore production) were always the highest in the surface mixed layer (50-72 m depth for the 4 stations) then decreased sharply, whereas POC downward flux (a proxy for remineralisation) was greatest below the surface mixed layer then decreased exponentially. It has been suggested that siderophores control L1 production whereas the remainder of ΣL may be set by particle breakdown (Hunter and Boyd, 2007). Hence we should expect some vertical partitioning of L1 (present < 70 m depth) and ΣL (present over the water column). However, profiles at all stations in subtropical, subantarctic, and polar waters exhibited distinguishable concentrations of L1 to 200 m depth (i.e. straddling both regions of putative L1 and ΣL production). There remain issues with the separation of different ligand classes, such that since [L1] ≤ [Fe], deeper in the water column, the concentration of L1 cannot be resolved, and hence the provenance of both L1 and ΣL cannot be clearly assigned.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:Iron biogeochemistry; Distributions; Iron; Ligands; Seawater; Southern Ocean
Research Division:Earth Sciences
Research Group:Oceanography
Research Field:Chemical oceanography
Objective Division:Environmental Management
Objective Group:Management of Antarctic and Southern Ocean environments
Objective Field:Antarctic and Southern Ocean oceanic processes
UTAS Author:Boyd, PW (Professor Philip Boyd)
UTAS Author:Bowie, AR (Professor Andrew Bowie)
ID Code:76811
Year Published:2011
Web of Science® Times Cited:56
Deposited By:CRC-Antarctic Climate & Ecosystems
Deposited On:2012-03-14
Last Modified:2014-10-14

Repository Staff Only: item control page