University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Guidelines for assessing clinical competence

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-16, 09:52 authored by Newble, D, Dauphinee, D, Macdonald, M, Mulholland, H, Dawson, B, Page, G, Swanson, D, Thomson, AN, van der Vleuten, C
Medical organizations responsible for assessing the clinical competence of large numbers of examinees have traditionally used written, oral, and observation-based examination methods. The results from these examinations form the basis for major professional decisions regarding promotion or privileges of medical students or physicians. In this article, we present a set of guidelines that examining bodies should follow in developing and implementing assessment procedures that are a valid reflection of examinees’ current level of competence and of their ability to perform satisfactorily at the next stage of training or practice. The guidelines are based on our collective experiences as well as the growing literature on assessment of clinical competence. The discussion covers issues that have not been fully addressed in previously published reviews, including identifying the competencies to be tested, selecting appropriate and realistic test methods, dealing with test administration and scoring, and setting standards for the desired level of performance. © 1994, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

History

Publication title

Teaching and Learning in Medicine

Volume

6

Pagination

213-220

ISSN

1040-1334

Department/School

Tasmanian School of Medicine

Publisher

Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc

Place of publication

Hillsdale, New Jersey

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Other education and training not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC