University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Recovery after electroconvulsive therapy: comparison of propofol with methohexitone anesthesia

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-16, 09:50 authored by Matters, RM, Beckett, WG, Kenneth KirkbyKenneth Kirkby, King, TE
We have studied prospectively 39 patients receiving a course of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for major depressive disorder; they were allocated randomly to receive either propofol or methohexitone for anaesthesia. Recovery after the third ECT treatment was assessed by finger tap and digit symbol substitution tests at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after induction. Seizure duration (median (interquartile range)) was shorter with propofol (24 (10)s) than methohexitone (29 (17)s) (P = 0.08). There was no significant difference in psychometric recovery for drug type, duration of the seizure or initial severity of depression. These results suggest that the more rapid recovery rates noted with propofol in other procedures are not evident after electrically induced seizures.

History

Publication title

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Volume

75

Pagination

297-300

ISSN

0007-0912

Department/School

Tasmanian School of Medicine

Publisher

Oxford Univ Press

Place of publication

Great Clarendon St, Oxford, England, Ox2 6Dp

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Other health not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC