eCite Digital Repository

Distribution of demersal fish assemblages along the west coast of St Lucia: implications for planning no-take marine reserves

Citation

Mitchell, PJ and Bolam, SG and Close, HL and Garcia, C and Monk, J and Alliji, K, Distribution of demersal fish assemblages along the west coast of St Lucia: implications for planning no-take marine reserves, Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems pp. 1-13. ISSN 1099-0755 (2021) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
2Mb
  

Copyright Statement

2021 Crown Copyright. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

DOI: doi:10.1002/aqc.3518

Abstract

  1. Evidence‐based decisions relating to effective marine protected areas as a means of conserving biodiversity require a detailed understanding of the species present. The Caribbean island nation of St Lucia is expanding its current marine protected area network by designating additional no‐take marine reserves on the west coast. However, information on the distribution of fish species is currently limited.
  2. This study used baited remote underwater stereo‐video to address this shortcoming by investigating the effects of depth and seabed habitat structure on demersal fish assemblages and comparing these assemblages between regions currently afforded different protection measures.
  3. From the 87 stations visited a total of 5,921 fish were observed comprising 120 fish taxa across 22 families. Species richness and total abundance were higher within the highly managed region, which included no‐take reserves. Redundancy analysis explained 17% of the total variance in fish distribution, driven predominantly by the seabed habitats. The redundancy analysis identified four main groups of demersal fishes each associated with specific seabed habitats.
  4. The current no‐take marine reserves protected two of these groups (i.e. fishes associated with the ‘soft corals, hard corals or gorgonians’ and ‘seagrass’ groups). Importantly, habitats dominated by sponges, bacterial mats, algal turfs or macroalgae, which also supported unique fish assemblages, are not currently afforded protection via the marine reserve network (based on the five reserves studied). These results imply that incorporation of the full breadth of benthic habitat types present would improve the efficacy of the marine reserve network by ensuring all fish assemblages are protected.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:fish monitoring, marine protected areas, biodiversity, Caribbean, coral, fish, seagrass, stereo-BRUV, subtidal
Research Division:Biological Sciences
Research Group:Ecology
Research Field:Marine and estuarine ecology (incl. marine ichthyology)
Objective Division:Environmental Management
Objective Group:Marine systems and management
Objective Field:Assessment and management of benthic marine ecosystems
UTAS Author:Monk, J (Dr Jacquomo Monk)
ID Code:142900
Year Published:2021
Web of Science® Times Cited:1
Deposited By:Ecology and Biodiversity
Deposited On:2021-02-15
Last Modified:2021-04-28
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page