eCite Digital Repository

The association between socioeconomic status and joint replacement of the hip and knee: a population-based cohort study of older adults in Tasmania

Citation

Munugoda, IP and Brennan-Olsen, SL and Wills, K and Cai, G and Graves, SE and Lorimer, M and Cicuttini, FM and Callisaya, ML and Aitken, D and Jones, G, The association between socioeconomic status and joint replacement of the hip and knee: a population-based cohort study of older adults in Tasmania, Internal Medicine Journal pp. 1-29. ISSN 1444-0903 (2020) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF (final author version)
Available from 26 September 2021
290Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2020. "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: [The association between socioeconomic status and joint replacement of the hip and knee: a population-based cohort study of older adults in Tasmania], which has been published in final form at [doi 10.1111/imj.15066]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions."

DOI: doi:10.1111/imj.15066

Abstract

Background: A socioeconomic gradient exists in the utilisation of total hip replacements (THR) and total knee replacements (TKR) for osteoarthritis. However, the relations between socioeconomic status (SES) and time to THR or TKR is unknown.

Aim: To describe the association between SES and time to THR and TKR.

Methods: 1072 older-adults residing in Tasmania, Australia were studied. Incident primary THR and TKR were determined by data linkage to the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. At baseline, each participant's area-level SES was determined by the Index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD), from the Australian Bureau of Statistics' 2001 census data. IRSAD was analysed in two ways; 1) categorised into quartiles, whereby quartile 1 represented the most socioeconomically disadvantaged group, 2) the cohort dichotomised at the quartile 1 cut-point.

Results: The mean age was 63.0 (7.5) years, and 51% were women. Over the median follow-up of 12.9 (Interquartile range: 12.2-13.9) years, 56 (5%) participants had a THR, and 79 (7%) had a TKR. Compared to the most disadvantaged quartile, less disadvantaged participants were less likely to have a THR (i.e. less disadvantaged participants had a longer time to THR) (HR: 0.56, 95% CI 0.32, 1.00) but not TKR (HR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.53, 1.54). However, the former became non-significant after adjustment for pain and radiographic osteoarthritis, suggesting that the associations may be mediated by these factors.

Conclusions: This study suggests that time to joint replacement was determined according to the symptoms/need of the participants rather than their SES.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:Australia, osteoarthritis, socioeconomic status, total hip replacement, total knee replacement
Research Division:Biomedical and Clinical Sciences
Research Group:Clinical sciences
Research Field:Rheumatology and arthritis
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Clinical health
Objective Field:Clinical health not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Munugoda, IP (Mr Ishanka Munugoda)
UTAS Author:Wills, K (Dr Karen Wills)
UTAS Author:Cai, G (Mr Guoqi Cai)
UTAS Author:Callisaya, ML (Dr Michele Callisaya)
UTAS Author:Aitken, D (Associate Professor Dawn Aitken)
UTAS Author:Jones, G (Professor Graeme Jones)
ID Code:141182
Year Published:2020
Deposited By:Menzies Institute for Medical Research
Deposited On:2020-09-30
Last Modified:2021-04-21
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page