File(s) under permanent embargo
Taking the discipline of law seriously: twining, Arthurs, and histories of academic lawyers
In 2019, William Twining and Harry Arthurs, academic lawyers whose careers peaked during the second half of the twentieth century, published memoirs revealing the central motivations and forces underlying their intellectual endeavor. Their books are a source of great nourishment, provoking readers to think deeply about the central challenges of the discipline of law and what might be done to bring it closer to realizing its full potential. They also reveal what it was like to be a leading academic who pushed disciplinary boundaries, challenging central disciplinary norms repeatedly, over many decades, while the universities and societies surrounding them grew in size and enjoyed increased prosperity and while academics-legal and otherwise-were cast in changing lights. During this time, writing and teaching about the nature and purposes of law moved from the desks of a few well-known figures into the hands of an increasingly diverse mass. This review considers and compares the contributions of these memoirs to the history of legal scholars. It also examines the relevance of each book to their primary readership: Twenty-first century academic lawyers.
History
Publication title
Law and History ReviewVolume
39Pagination
369-381ISSN
0738-2480Department/School
Faculty of LawPublisher
Cambridge University PressPlace of publication
UKRights statement
Copyright 2021 The Author(s). Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Society for Legal HistoryRepository Status
- Restricted