File(s) under permanent embargo
Communicating forensic scientific expertise: an analysis of expert reports and corresponding testimony in Tasmanian courts
Forensic criminology examines the use of forensic science in society. Justice can be hampered, for example, if the communication of forensic scientific findings is unclear or misleading, even if unintentionally. Although various recommendations guide the communication of forensic science, it is unclear whether they are reflected in practice. This study explored the communication of forensic biology in 10 cases of major crimes against the person heard in the Tasmanian Supreme Court, where the standard practice is to issue brief summary reports in the first instance. The content of expert reports and corresponding testimony was analysed to determine its adherence to recommendations outlined in standards, practice notes, and research. While reports were found to be very brief, testimony elaborated on all major elements. Mostly elicited by the prosecution, some elements were volunteered by expert witnesses, or raised by defence. Overall, expert evidence in courts—but not reports (due to the use of brief summary reports)—largely adhered to recommendations. Further research is needed to determine the prevalence and effectiveness of alternative approaches to communication that were identified in certain cases.
History
Publication title
Science and JusticeVolume
60Pagination
108-119ISSN
1355-0306Department/School
School of Social SciencesPublisher
Forensic Science SocPlace of publication
Clark House, 18A Mount Parade, Harrogate, England, N Yorkshire, Hg1 1BxRights statement
© 2019 The Chartered Society of Forensic Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.Repository Status
- Restricted