University of Tasmania
Browse
126457 - Floor feeding sows their daily allocation over multiple drops per day does not result in more equitable feeding opportunities in later drops.pdf (754.6 kB)

Floor feeding sows their daily allocation over multiple drops per day does not result in more equitable feeding opportunities in later drops

Download (754.6 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-19, 18:46 authored by Megan VerdonMegan Verdon, Zegarra, N, Achayra, R, Hemsworth, PH
This research studied whether floor feeding group-housed sows their daily allocation over multiple feed drops per day provides more equitable feeding opportunities in later drops. Over four time replicates, 275 sows were mixed into groups of 10 for both their first and second gestations (200 sows/gestation, 126 sows observed in both gestations). The feeding behavior of individual sows was recorded for 10 min following each of four feed drops per day (0730, 0900, 1100, 1500 h) on days 2, 9 and 51 post-mixing. The location of feeding sows (i.e., feeding in areas associated with high, reduced or little/no food availability) was also recorded. Sow aggressive behavior on day 2 was used to classify sows as dominant (D), subdominant (SD), or submissive (SM). Dominant sows spent the most time feeding in areas of high-food availability (gestation 1, p < 0.001; gestation 2, p = 0.023); SD sows fed more frequently than D sows from areas of reduced food availability (gestation 1, p = 0.001; gestation 2, p = 0.025); and SM sows performed more feeding behavior in areas of little/no food availability (gestation 1, p < 0.001; gestation 2, p < 0.001). These relationships did not change over feed drops or days in either gestation (p > 0.05). Further research on the management and design of floor feeding systems is required, with a particular emphasis on increasing accessibility to sows that avoid the feeding area.

History

Publication title

Animals

Volume

8

Issue

6

Article number

86

Number

86

Pagination

1-12

ISSN

1751-7311

Department/School

Regional Partnerships

Publisher

Cambridge University Press

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Rights statement

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Repository Status

  • Open

Socio-economic Objectives

Animal welfare

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC