University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Democratizing creativity: how Arts/Philosophy can contribute to the question of Arts bias

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-19, 07:43 authored by Rocavert, C
This article critically deconstructs the 21st-century economization and massification of creativity. It extends the discussion of arts bias and the associated ideas that artistic creativity is institutionalized, elitist, and an obstruction to more profitable applications of creativity. A tension is thus highlighted between the historically prevalent domain of art, and newer domains which focus on everyday, functional, organizational and the dark sides of creativity. The aim is to open up a genuine debate about the place of art in modern creativity discourse, and to examine the problematic theme of democratization in creativity as it relates to cultural, economic and industrial issues. A new framework for conceiving creativity in hermeneutics is also suggested, with a view to cohesively and logically balancing the artistic with other domains, and eliminating some of the current problems that render creativity less than it has been regarded in generations past.

History

Publication title

Creativity Research Journal

Volume

28

Pagination

229-237

ISSN

1040-0419

Department/School

School of Humanities

Publisher

Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc

Place of publication

10 Industrial Ave, Mahwah, USA, Nj, 07430-2262

Rights statement

Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Expanding knowledge in creative arts and writing studies

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC