University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Last Word on Point:Counterpoint: High altitude is/is not for the birds!

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-22, 00:31 authored by Hawkes, LA, Scott, GR, Meir, JU, Peter FrappellPeter Frappell, Milsom, WK
to the editor: We would like to thank the scientists who commented on this Point:Counterpoint. We originally argued that high altitude is for the birds because of several unique features that should improve their ability to exercise at extremely high altitudes (4). Many authors agreed with our Point, but several others highlighted the impressive ability of other vertebrates to tolerate hypoxia. These animals are indeed exceptional [Casey (1) in fact cites work by one of us (Meir) on these animals!], and we do not dispute the striking tolerance of acute, transient hypoxia by diving mammals (or by some birds, like penguins) or of chronic hypoxia/anoxia by carp, turtles, or hibernators. However, these animals use entirely different strategies in hypoxia, such as metabolic suppression, and they cannot compare with flying birds in their ability to sustain high rates of aerobic metabolism during prolonged exercise in hypoxia.

History

Publication title

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volume

111

Issue

5

Pagination

1525

ISSN

8750-7587

Department/School

Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies

Publisher

Amer Physiological Soc

Place of publication

9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, USA, Md, 20814

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Terrestrial biodiversity

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC