eCite Digital Repository

Challenges of measuring emergency management performance under adversity: The good the bad the ugly

Citation

Owen, C and Brooks, CB and Bearman, C, Challenges of measuring emergency management performance under adversity: The good the bad the ugly, Proceedings of the Research Forum at the Bushfire and Natural Hazards CRC & AFAC conference, 2 September 2014, Wellington, New Zealand, pp. 95-105. ISBN 978-0-9941696-3-1 (2015) [Refereed Conference Paper]

Microsoft Word (paper)
Restricted - Request a copy
339Kb

Preview
PDF
Restricted - Request a copy
241Kb

Copyright Statement

Copyright unknown

Official URL: http://www.bnhcrc.com.au/publications/biblio/bnh-1...

Abstract

Senior emergency management personnel face more extreme events and more complex challenges than their predecessors and these challenges will increase in the future. One of the key challenges that senior emergency managers face is the evaluation of operational performance in the context of increasing scrutiny from media, legal and political spheres. To investigate this issue we collected survey data from 38 senior emergency management leaders who operate at the strategic level (above the local IMT) as part of a broader survey examining the challenges of strategic emergency management (funded by the Bushfire CRC, Owen et al., 2013). Participants reported concerns that operational performance is currently judged by external sources (such as the media) in an often post- hoc and arbitrary manner and is dependent on whether or not what happened in the end was perceived as a good outcome. Reliance on the outcome of a complex event is problematic because there is not an absolute correlation between the process of managing an emergency and the outcome. Bad outcomes can occur despite good operational processes and good outcomes can occur despite bad operational processes. For example, all the best processes might have been in place and performed well but the outcome was bad because of unexpected climatic conditions, such as a wind change. This paper will outline the views of senior leaders in emergency management about what needs to be taken into account when measuring operational performance

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Conference Paper
Keywords:emergency management performance adversity
Research Division:Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Research Group:Psychology
Research Field:Industrial and Organisational Psychology
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:Other Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Field:Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified
Author:Owen, C (Dr Christine Owen)
Author:Brooks, CB (Associate Professor Benjamin Brooks)
ID Code:98897
Year Published:2015
Deposited By:Seafaring
Deposited On:2015-03-06
Last Modified:2017-11-07
Downloads:3 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page