eCite Digital Repository

Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity

Citation

Venter, O and Fuller, RA and Segan, DB and Carwardine, J and Brooks, T and Butchart, SHM and Di Marco, M and Iwamura, T and Joseph, L and O'Grady, D and Possingham, HP and Rondinini, C and Smith, RJ and Venter, M and Watson, JEM, Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity, PLoS Biology, 12, (6) Article e1001891. ISSN 1545-7885 (2014) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
416Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

DOI: doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001891

Abstract

Governments have agreed to expand the global protected area network from 13% to 17% of the world's land surface by 2020 (Aichi target 11) and to prevent the further loss of known threatened species (Aichi target 12). These targets are interdependent, as protected areas can stem biodiversity loss when strategically located and effectively managed. However, the global protected area estate is currently biased toward locations that are cheap to protect and away from important areas for biodiversity. Here we use data on the distribution of protected areas and threatened terrestrial birds, mammals, and amphibians to assess current and possible future coverage of these species under the convention. We discover that 17% of the 4,118 threatened vertebrates are not found in a single protected area and that fully 85% are not adequately covered (i.e., to a level consistent with their likely persistence). Using systematic conservation planning, we show that expanding protected areas to reach 17% coverage by protecting the cheapest land, even if ecoregionally representative, would increase the number of threatened vertebrates covered by only 6%. However, the nonlinear relationship between the cost of acquiring land and species coverage means that fivefold more threatened vertebrates could be adequately covered for only 1.5 times the cost of the cheapest solution, if cost efficiency and threatened vertebrates are both incorporated into protected area decision making. These results are robust to known errors in the vertebrate range maps. The Convention on Biological Diversity targets may stimulate major expansion of the global protected area estate. If this expansion is to secure a future for imperiled species, new protected areas must be sited more strategically than is presently the case.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Environmental Sciences
Research Group:Environmental Science and Management
Research Field:Conservation and Biodiversity
Objective Division:Environment
Objective Group:Ecosystem Assessment and Management
Objective Field:Ecosystem Assessment and Management at Regional or Larger Scales
Author:Brooks, T (Dr Thomas Brooks)
ID Code:98560
Year Published:2014
Web of Science® Times Cited:95
Deposited By:Geography and Environmental Studies
Deposited On:2015-02-19
Last Modified:2017-10-31
Downloads:136 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page