Thom, O and Keijzers, G and Davies, S and Taylor, DM and Knott, J and Middleton, PM, Clinical research priorities in emergency medicine: Results of a consensus meeting and development of a weighting method for assessment of clinical research priorities, Emergency Medicine Australasia, 26, (1) pp. 28-33. ISSN 1742-6731 (2014) [Refereed Article]
Copyright 2014 Wiley-Blackwell
Methods: A session at the ACEM annual scientific meeting was dedicated to this meeting. Results from a survey of the ACEM researcher database were presented, along with a proposed weighting matrix. After discussion and adjustment, consensus was achieved on the matrix.
Results: It was agreed that the following criteria be used in the matrix: research category and sub-category priority ranking from the ACEM researcher database survey, frequency of presentation of potentially eligible participants, the level of pre-existing evidence regarding the proposed research question and the likely clinical impact of the research. Each criterion was given a weighting, with clinical impact given the heaviest weighting. The weighting matrix was subsequently applied to the list of research questions that resulted from the researcher database survey and a list of research priorities determined.
Conclusion: The weighting matrix allows reproducible comparison of research questions. The resultant list of research priorities will act as a guide for the ACEM Clinical Trials Group in determining future projects.
|Item Type:||Refereed Article|
|Keywords:||clinical trial, emergency medicine, priority, research|
|Research Division:||Health Sciences|
|Research Group:||Health services and systems|
|Research Field:||Health informatics and information systems|
|Objective Group:||Evaluation of health and support services|
|Objective Field:||Evaluation of health and support services not elsewhere classified|
|UTAS Author:||Davies, S (Ms Suzanne Avis)|
|Web of Science® Times Cited:||11|
Repository Staff Only: item control page