Denniss, RJ and Davison, A, Self and world in lay interpretations of climate change, International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 7, (2) pp. 140-153. ISSN 1756-8692 (2015) [Refereed Article]
Copyright 2015 Emerald Group Publishing
Design – Through narrative analysis of qualitative interviews this study examines lay rationalities of climate change as a process of not only knowing the world (epistemology), but of being oriented towards the world (ontology) and valuing the world (axiology).
Findings – Findings emphasise the extent of individual variation in lay interpretations of climate change, and their internal complexity. Almost all participants display differences in reasoning about climate change when considering their personal lives as compared to the wider, public world. Distinct accounts of self and world in lay rationalities are evident in the ways that participants imagine the future and express their feelings of culpability for and responsibility to act on climate change.
Originality/Value – This paper argues that lay reasoning about climate science does not just engage ways of knowing the world, but also ways of being in and valuing the world so as to open up multiple trajectories for comprehension.
|Item Type:||Refereed Article|
|Keywords:||lay rationalities, everyday life, ontology, climate change, epistemology, qualitative interviews, axiology|
|Research Division:||Human Society|
|Research Group:||Human geography|
|Research Field:||Social geography|
|Objective Division:||Environmental Management|
|Objective Group:||Air quality, atmosphere and weather|
|Objective Field:||Air quality, atmosphere and weather not elsewhere classified|
|UTAS Author:||Denniss, RJ (Ms Bec Denniss)|
|UTAS Author:||Davison, A (Associate Professor Aidan Davison)|
|Web of Science® Times Cited:||1|
|Deposited By:||Geography and Environmental Studies|
Repository Staff Only: item control page