University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Confidence and accuracy of lineup selections and rejections: Postdicting rejection accuracy with confidence

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-18, 04:35 authored by Lindsay, RCL, Kelmet, N, Leung, J, Bertrand, MI, James SauerJames Sauer, Sauerland, M
Correlation and calibration approaches show meaningful, positive confidence-accuracy relations for witnesses making selections from lineups, but rarely for rejections (Brewer & Wells, 2006; Sauerland & Sporer, 2009). This disparity may reflect the difference between selecting a single photo versus rejecting a set of photos. Participants (N=101) in two experiments made selections from and rejections of lineups in situations requiring either a single confidence rating about a single face (typical of "choosers") or a single confidence rating about multiple faces (typical of "nonchoosers"). Mean confidence ratings were significantly higher for accurate versus inaccurate decisions for both selections and rejections when decisions were based on single faces. Single decisions about multiple faces produced no significant difference in confidence between correct and incorrect rejections but a significant difference for selections.

History

Publication title

Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition

Pagination

179-184

ISSN

2211-3681

Department/School

School of Psychological Sciences

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Place of publication

Netherlands

Rights statement

Copyright 2013 Elsevier

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Expanding knowledge in psychology

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC