eCite Digital Repository

Disconfirming feedback impairs subsequent eyewitness identification of a different culprit


Palmer, MA and Brewer, N and Weber, N and Sauer, J, Disconfirming feedback impairs subsequent eyewitness identification of a different culprit, Oral, June 26-29, Netherlands, pp. 1. (2013) [Conference Extract]

PDF (Conference abstracts; see p. 14)
Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy


Recent research shows that post-identification feedback affects subsequent identification performance in single-suspect crimes: confirming feedback improves subsequent identification performance and disconfirming feedback impairs performance. The present research demonstrates similar effects in multiple-culprit crimes. Witnesses viewed a mock crime and attempted to identify two different culprits from separate lineups. Following the first lineup witnesses received disconfirming feedback or no feedback. Identification performance for the second lineup was measured via ROC curves and compound SDT estimates of discriminability. Disconfirming feedback (vs. no feedback) following an attempted identification of one culprit impaired the identification of a different culprit from a subsequent lineup.

Item Details

Item Type:Conference Extract
Keywords:eyewitness identification; feedback; signal detection theory
Research Division:Psychology
Research Group:Applied and developmental psychology
Research Field:Forensic psychology
Objective Division:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:Expanding knowledge
Objective Field:Expanding knowledge in psychology
UTAS Author:Palmer, MA (Associate Professor Matt Palmer)
ID Code:89793
Year Published:2013
Deposited By:Psychology
Deposited On:2014-03-14
Last Modified:2014-03-20

Repository Staff Only: item control page