eCite Digital Repository
Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: A case study using Bayesian total error analysis
Citation
Thyer, M and Renard, B and Kavetski, D and Kuczera, G and Franks, SW and Srikanthan, S, Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: A case study using Bayesian total error analysis, Water Resources Research, 45 Article W00B14. ISSN 1944-7973 (2009) [Refereed Article]
Copyright Statement
Copyright 2009 American Geophysical Union
Abstract
The lack of a robust framework for quantifying the parametric and predictive
uncertainty of conceptual rainfall-runoff (CRR) models remains a key challenge in
hydrology. The Bayesian total error analysis (BATEA) methodology provides a
comprehensive framework to hypothesize, infer, and evaluate probability models
describing input, output, and model structural error. This paper assesses the ability of
BATEA and standard calibration approaches (standard least squares (SLS) and weighted
least squares (WLS)) to address two key requirements of uncertainty assessment:
(1) reliable quantification of predictive uncertainty and (2) reliable estimation of parameter
uncertainty. The case study presents a challenging calibration of the lumped GR4J model
to a catchment with ephemeral responses and large rainfall gradients. Postcalibration
diagnostics, including checks of predictive distributions using quantile-quantile analysis,
suggest that while still far from perfect, BATEA satisfied its assumed probability models
better than SLS and WLS. In addition, WLS/SLS parameter estimates were highly
dependent on the selected rain gauge and calibration period. This will obscure potential
relationships between CRR parameters and catchment attributes and prevent the
development of meaningful regional relationships. Conversely, BATEA provided
consistent, albeit more uncertain, parameter estimates and thus overcomes one of the
obstacles to parameter regionalization. However, significant departures from the
calibration assumptions remained even in BATEA, e.g., systematic overestimation of
predictive uncertainty, especially in validation. This is likely due to the inferred rainfall
errors compensating for simplified treatment of model structural error.
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | uncertainty hydrological modelling BATEA rainfall model |
Research Division: | Engineering |
Research Group: | Environmental engineering |
Research Field: | Air pollution modelling and control |
Objective Division: | Environmental Management |
Objective Group: | Other environmental management |
Objective Field: | Other environmental management not elsewhere classified |
UTAS Author: | Franks, SW (Professor Stewart Franks) |
ID Code: | 86414 |
Year Published: | 2009 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 262 |
Deposited By: | Engineering |
Deposited On: | 2013-09-14 |
Last Modified: | 2013-10-30 |
Downloads: | 0 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page