Dewsbury, M and Fay, R, An empirical validation of the 'AccuRate' software envelope model in an Australian cool-temperate climate, ANZASCA Conference Proceedings: Building on Knowledge: Theory and Practice, 14-16 November 2012, Giffith University, pp. 1-8. ISBN 978-0-646-59169-8 (2012) [Refereed Conference Paper]
Copyright 2012 The Authors and ASA2012
Official URL: http://anzasca.net/2012papers/
In 2003, the Building Code of Australia introduced its first thermal performance requirements for residential buildings. It mandated a minimum performance rating of 4 Stars when assessed by approved rating methods. This requirement has been progressively increased to 5 Stars in 2006 and 6 Stars in 2010. While the introduction of a 4 Stars requirement had only a minor impact on construction practices, the move from 4 to 5 and then 5 to 6 Stars has forced considerable change, especially in the use of timber platform floors in cool-temperate climates. The adoption of the prescribed energy efficiency measures in the National Construction Code (previously known as the Building Code of Australia) raised concerns from industry and manufacturing groups, as to the accuracy of the simulation method when compared to the actual thermal performance of residential buildings. Both industry and government recognised the need to validate the National House Energy Rating's (NatHERS) benchmark software 'AccuRate'. The software 'AccuRate' has been developed over time by the CSIRO and has evolved from a design tool to a regulatory tool.
As a result, the School of Architecture & Design and its research arm, the Centre for Sustainable Architecture with Wood, was tasked with the validation of the 'AccuRate' HER software. The University of Tasmania, with the support of Forest and Wood Products Australia, the Australian Government, the CSIRO and industry, undertook the construction of three test buildings for the purpose of empirically validating the 'AccuRate' software in a cool temperate climate. The three test buildings followed standard residential construction practices and included an unenclosed-perimeter platform-floored building, an enclosed-perimeter platform-floored building and a concrete slab-onground floored building.The process of design, construction, environmental measurement, detailed simulation and methods of statistical analysis are discussed briefly. Graphical analysis is used to illustrate the variations that occurred between the measured and simulated zone temperatures for each test building. The statistical analysis of the measured and simulated data indicated the need for further investigation of the ground, subfloor, roof space and thermal mass algorithms. If the differences observed in this research were applied to full-scale houses there may be a significant impact on the House Energy Star rating. The research identified the need for the continuous improvement and calibration of the AccuRate software.
|Item Type:||Refereed Conference Paper|
|Keywords:||house energy rating, impirical validation, NatHERS|
|Research Division:||Built Environment and Design|
|Research Field:||Architectural Science and Technology (incl. Acoustics, Lighting, Structure and Ecologically Sustainable Design)|
|Objective Group:||Energy Conservation and Efficiency|
|Objective Field:||Residential Energy Conservation and Efficiency|
|UTAS Author:||Dewsbury, M (Dr Mark Dewsbury)|
|UTAS Author:||Fay, R (Professor Roger Fay)|
|Downloads:||1 View Download Statistics|
Repository Staff Only: item control page