eCite Digital Repository
The confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification decisions: effects of exposure duration, retention interval, and divided attention
Citation
Palmer, MA and Brewer, N and Weber, N and Nagesh, A, The confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification decisions: effects of exposure duration, retention interval, and divided attention, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 19, (1) pp. 55-71. ISSN 1076-898X (2013) [Refereed Article]
Copyright Statement
Copyright 2013 American Psychological Association
DOI: doi:10.1037/a0031602
Abstract
Prior research points to a meaningful confidence-accuracy (CA) relationship for positive identification
decisions. However, there are theoretical grounds for expecting that different aspects of the
CA relationship (calibration, resolution, and over/underconfidence) might be undermined in some
circumstances. This research investigated whether the CA relationship for eyewitness identification
decisions is affected by three, forensically relevant variables: exposure duration, retention interval,
and divided attention at encoding. In Study 1 (N = 986), a field experiment, we examined the effects
of exposure duration (5 s vs. 90 s) and retention interval (immediate testing vs. a 1-week delay) on
the CA relationship. In Study 2 (N = 502), we examined the effects of attention during encoding on
the CA relationship by reanalyzing data from a laboratory experiment in which participants viewed
a stimulus video under full or divided attention conditions and then attempted to identify two targets
from separate lineups. Across both studies, all three manipulations affected identification accuracy.
The central analyses concerned the CA relation for positive identification decisions. For
the manipulations of exposure duration and retention interval, overconfidence was greater in the
more difficult conditions (shorter exposure; delayed testing) than the easier conditions. Only the
exposure duration manipulation influenced resolution (which was better for 5 s than 90 s), and only
the retention interval manipulation affected calibration (which was better for immediate testing than
delayed testing). In all experimental conditions, accuracy and diagnosticity increased with confidence,
particularly at the upper end of the confidence scale. Implications for theory and forensic
settings are discussed.
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | eyewitness identification, confidence-accuracy calibration, exposure duration, retention |
Research Division: | Psychology |
Research Group: | Applied and developmental psychology |
Research Field: | Forensic psychology |
Objective Division: | Expanding Knowledge |
Objective Group: | Expanding knowledge |
Objective Field: | Expanding knowledge in psychology |
UTAS Author: | Palmer, MA (Associate Professor Matt Palmer) |
ID Code: | 83328 |
Year Published: | 2013 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 128 |
Deposited By: | Psychology |
Deposited On: | 2013-03-08 |
Last Modified: | 2017-11-07 |
Downloads: | 0 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page