eCite Digital Repository

Eco-label conveys reliable information on fish stock health to seafood consumers

Citation

Gutierrez, N and Valencia, S and Branch, TA and Agnew, DJ and Baum, JK and Bianchi, PL and Cornejo-Donoso, J and Costello, C and Defeo, O and Essington, TE and Hilborn, R and Hoggarth, DD and Larsen, AE and Ninnes, C and Sainsbury, K and Selden, RL and Sistla, S and Smith, ADM and Stern-Pirlot, A and Teck, SJ and Thorson, JT and Williams, NE, Eco-label conveys reliable information on fish stock health to seafood consumers, PloS ONE, 7, (8) Article e43765. ISSN 1932-6203 (2012) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
575Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

DOI: doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043765

Abstract

Concerns over fishing impacts on marine populations and ecosystems have intensified the need to improve ocean management. One increasingly popular market-based instrument for ecological stewardship is the use of certification and eco-labeling programs to highlight sustainable fisheries with low environmental impacts. The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) is the most prominent of these programs. Despite widespread discussions about the rigor of the MSC standards, no comprehensive analysis of the performance of MSC-certified fish stocks has yet been conducted. We compared status and abundance trends of 45 certified stocks with those of 179 uncertified stocks, finding that 74% of certified fisheries were above biomass levels that would produce maximum sustainable yield, compared with only 44% of uncertified fisheries. On average, the biomass of certified stocks increased by 46% over the past 10 years, whereas uncertified fisheries increased by just 9%. As part of the MSC process, fisheries initially go through a confidential pre-assessment process. When certified fisheries are compared with those that decline to pursue full certification after pre-assessment, certified stocks had much lower mean exploitation rates (67% of the rate producing maximum sustainable yield vs. 92% for those declining to pursue certification), allowing for more sustainable harvesting and in many cases biomass rebuilding. From a consumer's point of view this means that MSC-certified seafood is 3-5 times less likely to be subject to harmful fishing than uncertified seafood. Thus, MSC-certification accurately identifies healthy fish stocks and conveys reliable information on stock status to seafood consumers.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:article, biomass, certification, consumer, environmental impact, environmental sustainability, fish stock, fishery management, food safety, information dissemination, reliability, sea food
Research Division:Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences
Research Group:Fisheries Sciences
Research Field:Aquatic Ecosystem Studies and Stock Assessment
Objective Division:Animal Production and Animal Primary Products
Objective Group:Fisheries - Wild Caught
Objective Field:Wild Caught Crustaceans (excl. Rock Lobster and Prawns)
Author:Sainsbury, K (Professor Keith Sainsbury)
ID Code:82675
Year Published:2012
Web of Science® Times Cited:49
Deposited By:Sustainable Marine Research Collaboration
Deposited On:2013-02-12
Last Modified:2017-11-06
Downloads:224 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page