eCite Digital Repository

What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service

Citation

Shearer, B and Marshall, S and Buist, MD and Finnigan, M and Kitto, S and Hore, T and Sturgess, T and Wilson, S and Ramsay, W, What stops hospital clinical staff from following protocols? An analysis of the incidence and factors behind the failure of bedside clinical staff to activate the rapid response system in a multi-campus Australian metropolitan healthcare service, BMJ Quality and Safety, 21, (7) pp. 569 - 575. ISSN 2044-5415 (2012) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
170Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC 2.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/

DOI: doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2011-000692

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore the causes of failure to activate the rapid response system (RRS). The organisation has a recognised incidence of staff failing to act when confronted with a deteriorating patient and leading to adverse outcomes. DESIGN: A multi-method study using the following: a point prevalence survey to determine the incidence of abnormal simple bedside observations and activation of the rapid response team by clinical staff; a prospective audit of all patients experiencing a cardiac arrest, unplanned intensive care unit admission or death over an 8-week period; structured interviews of staff to explore cognitive and sociocultural barriers to activating the RRS. SETTING: Southern Health is a comprehensive healthcare network with 570 adult in-patient beds across four metropolitan teaching hospitals in the south-eastern sector of Melbourne. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of physiological instability and outcomes within the in-patient hospital population. Qualitative data from staff interviews were thematically coded. RESULTS: The incidence of physiological instability in the acute adult population was 4.04%. Nearly half of these patients (42%) did not receive an appropriate clinical response from the staff, despite most (69.2%) recognising their patient met physiological criteria for activating the RRS, and being 'quite', or 'very' concerned about their patient (75.8%). Structured interviews with 91 staff members identified predominantly sociocultural reasons for failure to activate the RRS. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an organisational commitment to the RRS, clinical staff act on local cultural rules within the clinical environment that are usually not explicit. Better understanding of these informal rules may lead to more appropriate activation of the RRS

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Medical and Health Sciences
Research Group:Public Health and Health Services
Research Field:Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health)
Objective Field:Injury Control
Author:Buist, MD (Professor Michael Buist)
ID Code:82664
Year Published:2012
Web of Science® Times Cited:77
Deposited By:Medicine (Discipline)
Deposited On:2013-02-12
Last Modified:2017-11-02
Downloads:176 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page