eCite Digital Repository

Some problems with extrajudicial writing

Citation

Bartie, S and Gava, J, Some problems with extrajudicial writing, Sydney Law Review, The, 34, (4) pp. 637-658. ISSN 0082-0512 (2012) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
Restricted - Request a copy
5Mb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2012 Sydney Law Review

Official URL: http://sydney.edu.au/law/slr/slr_34/slr34_4.shtml

Abstract

Since the Second World War, judges in Australia and the United Kingdom have increasingly written legal articles and textbooks. The purpose of this article is to test current dogma, which paints as innocuous the practice of extrajudicial writing on points of law, by showing that there are some very real problems raised by the practice; problems that threaten the integrity of the judiciary. We argue that committed writing by sitting judges amounts to prejudging of potential legal issues, and acts as a signal to potential" litigants. It is also argued that committed extrajudicial writing differs in its effects to holdings in previous cases; that it is different in fundamental ways from the writing of academics who subsequently become judges or the advocacy of barristers and solicitors who go on to become judges, and that its contemporary prevalence is not a measure of its appropriateness. Finally, we will offer a solution to the problems that we have identified: judicial silence.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Law and Legal Studies
Research Group:Law
Research Field:Law not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:Justice and the Law
Objective Field:Justice and the Law not elsewhere classified
Author:Bartie, S (Ms Susan Bartie)
ID Code:81899
Year Published:2012
Web of Science® Times Cited:3
Deposited By:Law
Deposited On:2013-01-10
Last Modified:2017-11-20
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page