eCite Digital Repository

Regulatory legitimacy: the case for controlling and restricting access to PGD for sex-selection purposes


Chalmers, DRC, Regulatory legitimacy: the case for controlling and restricting access to PGD for sex-selection purposes, Regulating Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis: A comparative and theoretical analysis, Routledge, Sheila A.M. McLean and Sarah Elliston (ed), Oxford, pp. 148-170. ISBN 9780415686440 (2013) [Research Book Chapter]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2013 The Authors

Official URL:


Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis embryo screening and assisted reproductive technology Thirty years after the first birth using in vitro fertilisation (IVF), the assisted reproductive technology (ART) debates have continued, raising issues concerning embryo experimentation, including the use of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to screen embryos for genetic characteristics and conditions. PGD is used to screen embryos to assist in deciding which may be judged suitable for implantation. Those not deemed suitable are generally discarded, although they may be used for research purposes, given that any required consent has been obtained. This chapter examines the regulatory regime for PGD in Australia which can be found principally in the National Health and Medical Research Council's (NHMRC) Ethical Guidelines on the Use of Assisted Reproductive Technology and Clinical Practice and Research (2007). Where PGD is used in embryo research, the regulatory regime established by the Research Involving Human Embryos Act 2002 applies. An Australian government committee reviewed this regime, which resulted in revisions to the NHMRC guidelines and to the legislation. This chapter focuses on PGD embryo screening and the regulatory justifications for controlling and restricting access to PGD in ART clinical procedures, with specific reference to its use in sex selection for non-medical reasons.

Item Details

Item Type:Research Book Chapter
Research Division:Law and Legal Studies
Research Group:Public law
Research Field:Public law not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:Justice and the law
Objective Field:Justice and the law not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Chalmers, DRC (Professor Don Chalmers)
ID Code:81838
Year Published:2013
Deposited By:Law
Deposited On:2013-01-09
Last Modified:2017-11-21
Downloads:5 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page