University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Sentencing Review 2011-2012

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-17, 14:12 authored by Catherine WarnerCatherine Warner
In this review period (2011 to October 2012), the High Court has granted special leave in four sentencing appeals, three of these dealing with Crown sentencing appeals: Lacey v The Queen, Green v the Queen and Bui v DPP. A common thread in the first two decisions is a reluctance to remove the common law constraints and fetters on Crown appeals that erode the common law protections against double jeopardy. But in the third decision, Bui v DPP, the High Court made it clear. that the common law "principle" of double jeopardy is irrelevant in Commonwealth Crown sentencing appeals. The second part of the review revisits the perennial policy issue of constraints on sentencing discretion. It updates the discussion in last year's review on standard non-parole periods (SNPPs) and describes the abandonment of this approach in Queensland in favour of mandatory penalties for some repeat child sex offenders. It concludes with a critique of penal populism and a plea to policy-makers to reconsider more principled measures to constrain judicial discretion than mandatory sentences.

History

Publication title

Criminal Law Journal

Volume

36

Pagination

384-394

ISSN

0314-1160

Department/School

Faculty of Law

Publisher

Thomson Reuters

Place of publication

Pyrmont

Rights statement

Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Criminal justice

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC