Rush, Penelope A, Objectivities, Studia Philosophica Estonica, 5, (1) pp. 1-16. ISSN 1736-5899 (2012) [Refereed Article]
Copyright 2012 Author
Official URL: http://www.spe.ut.ee/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/spe/artic...
I argue that one in particular of Crispin Wright’s attempts to capture our common or intuitive concepts of objectivity, warrant, and other associated notions, relies on an ambiguity between a given constructivist reading of the concepts and at least one other, arguably more ‘ordinary’, version of the notions he tries to accommodate. I do this by focusing on one case in point, and concluding with a brief argument showing how this case generalises. I demonstrate why this ambiguity is unacceptable and also that its resolution undermines the aim it serves: to account for and accommodate our ordinary conception of (at least) objectivity, warrant (or justification) and truth.
|Item Type:||Refereed Article|
|Research Division:||Philosophy and Religious Studies|
|Objective Division:||Expanding Knowledge|
|Objective Group:||Expanding knowledge|
|Objective Field:||Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies|
|UTAS Author:||Rush, Penelope A (Dr Penelope Rush)|
Repository Staff Only: item control page