eCite Digital Repository

Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: symbolism or action?


Hrasky, S, Carbon footprints and legitimation strategies: symbolism or action?, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25, (1) pp. 174-198. ISSN 0951-3574 (2012) [Refereed Article]

Not available

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2012 Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

DOI: doi:10.1108/09513571211191798


Purpose: Climate change and carbon footprints are among the most urgent concerns facing society and are key issues of corporate responsibility. The purpose of this study is to assess whether Australian companies have adjusted their footprint‐related disclosure responses. Adopting a legitimacy perspective, a key aim is to assess whether pragmatic or moral legitimation approaches dominate by determining whether disclosure tends to be more reflective of symbolism or of apparent behaviour.

Design/methodology/approach: Content analysis of the sustainability and annual reports of the ASX's Top 50 companies is undertaken to compare carbon footprint‐related disclosures in 2008 and 2005. Their extent and nature (action or symbolism) and the use of attention‐attracting devices are reported for the more carbon intensive and less carbon intensive sectors.

Findings: Footprint‐related disclosure rates are increasing, and disclosure is being signalled more prominently. However, while carbon‐intensive sectors appear to be pursuing a moral legitimation strategy underpinned by substantive action, the less intensive sectors are relying more heavily on symbolic disclosure.

Research limitations/implications: The sample size is small and comprises only large listed Australian companies.

Practical implications: While the carbon‐intensive sectors appear to be taking encouraging actions, a regulatory response may be required for the less carbon‐intensive sectors to take advantage of their market power to facilitate cooperative carbon reduction with broader constituent groups. Further, incentives for the carbon‐intensive sectors may be needed to encourage ongoing efforts to bridge the carbon chasm that is emerging.

Originality/value: This study appears to be the first to provide direct Australian evidence on favoured legitimation tactics by assessing the symbolic versus behavioural management implicit in carbon footprint‐related disclosures.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:carbon footprint, environmental disclosure, legitimation, carbon intensity, Australia, carbon, disclosure
Research Division:Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services
Research Group:Accounting, auditing and accountability
Research Field:Accounting theory and standards
Objective Division:Environmental Policy, Climate Change and Natural Hazards
Objective Group:Understanding climate change
Objective Field:Understanding climate change not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Hrasky, S (Dr Susan Hrasky)
ID Code:76322
Year Published:2012
Web of Science® Times Cited:117
Deposited By:Accounting and Accountability
Deposited On:2012-03-05
Last Modified:2015-08-06

Repository Staff Only: item control page