File(s) under permanent embargo
Defining biotechnology - carefully
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-21, 23:30 authored by Arundel, A, van Beuzekom, B, Gillespie, IHenry Miller's opinion piece, Biotech's defining moments [1], in the February issue of Trends in Biotechnology, raises the important problem of how to define biotechnology and some ofthe problems that definitional issues have created, in his opinion, for regulation. He then turns to the report GEeD Biotechnology Statistics 2006 (http://www.oecd.org! dataoeccl/51159/36760212.pdf), which he cites as an 'egregious and recent example of definitional dysfunction' that partly uses a broad definition of biotechnology that would 'yield worthless results'. He concludes that 'the data in the OECD report are garbage'. Being responsible for the report, we are bemused by Miller's scathing review. The irony is that we share his concerns over the need to carefully define biotechnology - which is precisely what the report does.
History
Publication title
Trends in BiotechnologyVolume
25Issue
8Pagination
331-332ISSN
0167-7799Department/School
TSBEPublisher
Elsevier Science LondonPlace of publication
84 Theobalds Rd, London, England, WC1X 8RRRepository Status
- Restricted