eCite Digital Repository

Equitable and Empowering School Settings: Reducing the gap between advantage and disadvantage


Conway, Natalie and Paton, D, Equitable and Empowering School Settings: Reducing the gap between advantage and disadvantage, ICERI 2011 Conference Proceedings, 14th - 16th November 2011, Madrid, Spain, pp. 004678-004686. ISBN 978-84-615-3324-4 (2011) [Conference Extract]

Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy


documented, including links with low self-esteem, difficulty making and maintaining friendships, learned helplessness, reduced confidence in ability to learn and be successful, low achievement motivation, attention problems, maladaptive behaviours and increased risk of suicide. In Australia, the need to provide high quality, and equitable, education to all young Australians is highlighted in The Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians [1]. Policies, such as the implementation of a nationwide curriculum, strive for delivery of high quality and equitable education with regards to the curriculum taught but it does not address how equity in regards to educational outcomes for socially disadvantaged groups is attained. It is argued that attempts to remedy academic difficulties often target learning outcomes at the individual level (e.g., school based reading recovery programmes) reflecting the perspective that difficulties sit within the individual. This approach to intervention fails to take into consideration the ecological influences on the learning process and social context in which learning occurs. The benefits of moving from an individual perspective to a systems level perspective (e.g., ecological model), and therefore a systemic model of intervention, is reflected in the community psychology and Positive Youth Development literature. These approaches emphasise that development occurs as part of an interaction between the individual and their environment (i.e., school) and that when there is a ‘goodness of fit’ between the individual and the environment, optimal development occurs. What is missing in the literature is an understanding of the personal learning experience of students and how individual characteristics (i.e., personal experiences and competencies) and social contexts interact with structures and processes within the school and impact on learning outcomes. Further, it is argued that greater consideration should be given to how educational activities and policies which influence the social/cultural context (e.g., National Assessment Programmes for Literacy and Numeracy) are developed and implemented within schools, and how school settings themselves influence the development of not only academic achievement but social and emotional development. Further research is needed to clarify how equitable outcomes can be enacted within school settings characterised by diversity and to define ‘how’ the curriculum should be taught in ways that facilitate inclusivity and engagement in addition to ‘what’ should be taught. It is argued that understanding the ‘how’ identifies an issue missing in the academic achievement literature. Drawing on empowerment theory, this paper discusses the development of an overarching theory that can guide decision making and inform policy development that facilitates equitable academic outcomes for all students by promoting the development and enactment of empowering academic settings that are able to accommodate diverse needs and the mapping of targeted engagement, and subsequent intervention, in ways that promote sustainable learning outcomes.

Item Details

Item Type:Conference Extract
Keywords:equity, empowerment, school, academic achievement, disadvantage.
Research Division:Psychology
Research Group:Social and personality psychology
Research Field:Social psychology
Objective Division:Education and Training
Objective Group:Other education and training
Objective Field:Other education and training not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Conway, Natalie (Ms Natalie Conway)
UTAS Author:Paton, D (Professor Douglas Paton)
ID Code:75340
Year Published:2011
Deposited By:Psychology
Deposited On:2012-01-24
Last Modified:2012-03-16

Repository Staff Only: item control page