eCite Digital Repository

Commentary reply to Pollock et al. (2011): Meta-analysis issues on bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress

Citation

Cauraugh, JH and Lodha, N and Naik, SK and Summers, JJ, Commentary reply to Pollock et al. (2011): Meta-analysis issues on bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress, Human Movement Science: Journal Devoted to Pure and Applied Research on Human Movement, 30 pp. 147-149. ISSN 0167-9457 (2011) [Contribution to Refereed Journal]

Copyright Statement

The definitive version is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com

DOI: doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.01.001

Abstract

Our meta-analysis and conclusions favoring positive bilateral movement training effects on stroke motor recovery (Cauraugh, Lodha, Naik, & Summers, 2010) have been questioned by Pollock, Morris, van Wijck, Coupar, and Langhorne (2011). Their letter to the editor focuses on three subtle metaanalysis techniques. This reply addresses each concern, confirms our robust meta-analysis, and steadfastly upholds our findings.

Item Details

Item Type:Contribution to Refereed Journal
Research Division:Psychology and Cognitive Sciences
Research Group:Psychology
Research Field:Sensory Processes, Perception and Performance
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Clinical Health (Organs, Diseases and Abnormal Conditions)
Objective Field:Nervous System and Disorders
Author:Summers, JJ (Professor Jeffery Summers)
ID Code:74948
Year Published:2011
Deposited By:Psychology
Deposited On:2011-12-16
Last Modified:2012-08-28
Downloads:1 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page