eCite Digital Repository
Commentary reply to Pollock et al. (2011): Meta-analysis issues on bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress
Citation
Cauraugh, JH and Lodha, N and Naik, SK and Summers, JJ, Commentary reply to Pollock et al. (2011): Meta-analysis issues on bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress, Human Movement Science: Journal Devoted to Pure and Applied Research on Human Movement, 30 pp. 147-149. ISSN 0167-9457 (2011) [Contribution to Refereed Journal]
Copyright Statement
The definitive version is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com
DOI: doi:10.1016/j.humov.2011.01.001
Abstract
Our meta-analysis and conclusions favoring positive bilateral movement training effects on stroke
motor recovery (Cauraugh, Lodha, Naik, & Summers, 2010) have been questioned by Pollock, Morris,
van Wijck, Coupar, and Langhorne (2011). Their letter to the editor focuses on three subtle metaanalysis
techniques. This reply addresses each concern, confirms our robust meta-analysis, and
steadfastly upholds our findings.
Item Details
Item Type: | Contribution to Refereed Journal |
---|---|
Research Division: | Psychology |
Research Group: | Cognitive and computational psychology |
Research Field: | Sensory processes, perception and performance |
Objective Division: | Health |
Objective Group: | Clinical health |
Objective Field: | Clinical health not elsewhere classified |
UTAS Author: | Summers, JJ (Professor Jeffery Summers) |
ID Code: | 74948 |
Year Published: | 2011 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 1 |
Deposited By: | Psychology |
Deposited On: | 2011-12-16 |
Last Modified: | 2012-08-28 |
Downloads: | 1 View Download Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page