eCite Digital Repository
Neural Biases to Covert and Overt Signals of Fear: Dissociation by Trait Anxiety and Depression
Citation
Williams, LM and Kemp, AH and Felmingham, KL and Liddell, BJ and Palmer, DM and Bryant, RA, Neural Biases to Covert and Overt Signals of Fear: Dissociation by Trait Anxiety and Depression, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, (10) pp. 1595-1608. ISSN 0898-929X (2007) [Refereed Article]
![]() | PDF Restricted - Request a copy 572Kb |
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2007 Massachusetts Institute of Technology
DOI: doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.10.1595
Abstract
Although biases toward signals of fear may be an evolutionary
adaptation necessary for survival, heightened biases
may be maladaptive and associated with anxiety or depression.
In this study, event-related potentials (ERPs) were used to examine
the time course of neural responses to facial fear stimuli
(versus neutral) presented overtly (for 500 msec with conscious
attention) and covertly (for 10 msec with immediate
masking to preclude conscious awareness) in 257 nonclinical
subjects. We also examined the impact of trait anxiety and
depression, assessed using psychometric ratings, on the time
course of ERPs. In the total subject group, controlled biases
to overtly processed fear were reflected in an enhancement of
ERPs associated with structural encoding (120–220 msec) and
sustained evaluation persisting from 250 msec and beyond,
following a temporo-occipital to frontal topography. By contrast,
covert fear processing elicited automatic biases, reflected
in an enhancement of ERPs prior to structural encoding (80–
180 msec) and again in the period associated with automatic
orienting and emotion encoding (230–330 msec), which followed
the reverse frontal to temporo-occipital topography.
Higher levels of trait anxiety (in the clinical range) were distinguished
by a heightened bias to covert fear (speeding of
early ERPs), compared to higher depression which was associated
with an opposing bias to overt fear (slowing of later
ERPs). Anxiety also heightened early responses to covert fear,
and depression to overt fear, with subsequent deficits in emotion
encoding in each case. These findings are consistent with
neural biases to signals of fear which operate automatically
and during controlled processing, feasibly supported by parallel
networks. Heightened automatic biases in anxiety may contribute
to a cycle of hypervigilance and anxious thoughts,
whereas depression may represent a ‘‘burnt out’’ emotional
state in which evaluation of fear stimuli is prolonged only when
conscious attention is allocated.
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Research Division: | Psychology |
Research Group: | Biological psychology |
Research Field: | Behavioural neuroscience |
Objective Division: | Health |
Objective Group: | Clinical health |
Objective Field: | Clinical health not elsewhere classified |
UTAS Author: | Felmingham, KL (Professor Kim Felmingham) |
ID Code: | 72133 |
Year Published: | 2007 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 65 |
Deposited By: | Psychology |
Deposited On: | 2011-08-22 |
Last Modified: | 2011-11-03 |
Downloads: | 4 View Download Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page