eCite Digital Repository

Author reply to: 'Clinical thresholds for ambulatory blood pressure measurement reinvented?'

Citation

Head, G and Mihailidou, S and Duggan, K and Beilin, LJ and Berry, N and Brown, MA and Bune, AJ and Cowley, D and Chalmers, JP and Howe, PRC and Hodgson, J and Ludbrook, J and Mangoni, A and McGrath, B and Nelson, MR and Sharman, JE and Stowasser, M, Author reply to: 'Clinical thresholds for ambulatory blood pressure measurement reinvented?', British Medical Journal, 2010, (340) Article c1104. ISSN 0959-535X (2010) [Letter or Note in Journal]

DOI: doi:10.1136/bmj.c1104

Abstract

Background: Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressure thresholds have been defined for the diagnosis of mild hypertension but not for its treatment or for other blood pressure thresholds used in the diagnosis of moderate to severe hypertension. We aimed to derive age and sex related ambulatory blood pressure equivalents to clinic blood pressure thresholds for diagnosis and treatment of hypertension. Methods: We collated 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure data, recorded with validated devices, from 11 centres across six Australian states (n=8575). We used least product regression to assess the relation between these measurements and clinic blood pressure measured by trained staff and in a smaller cohort by doctors (n=1693). Results: Mean age of participants was 56 years (SD 15) with mean body mass index 28.9 (5.5) and mean clinic systolic/diastolic blood pressure 142/82 mm Hg (19/12); 4626 (54%) were women. Average clinic measurements by trained staff were 6/3 mm Hg higher than daytime ambulatory blood pressure and 10/5 mm Hg higher than 24 hour blood pressure, but 9/7 mm Hg lower than clinic values measured by doctors. Daytime ambulatory equivalents derived from trained staff clinic measurements were 4/3 mm Hg less than the 140/90 mm Hg clinic threshold (lower limit of grade 1 hyperten sion), 2/2 mm Hg less than the 130/80 mm Hg threshold (target upper limit for patients with associated conditions), and 1/1 mm Hg less than the 125/75 mm Hg threshold. Equivalents were 1/2 mm Hg lower for women and 3/1 mm Hg lower in older people compared with the combined group. Conclusions: Our study provides daytime ambulatory blood pressure thresholds that are slightly lower than equivalent clinic values. Clinic blood pressure measurements taken by doctors were considerably higher than those taken by trained staff and therefore gave inappropriate estimates of ambulatory thresholds. These results provide a framework for the diagnosis and management of hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure values.

Item Details

Item Type:Letter or Note in Journal
Research Division:Medical and Health Sciences
Research Group:Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Research Field:Cardiology (incl. Cardiovascular Diseases)
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Clinical Health (Organs, Diseases and Abnormal Conditions)
Objective Field:Cardiovascular System and Diseases
Author:Nelson, MR (Professor Mark Nelson)
Author:Sharman, JE (Professor James Sharman)
ID Code:70915
Year Published:2010
Web of Science® Times Cited:85
Deposited By:Menzies Institute for Medical Research
Deposited On:2011-07-05
Last Modified:2017-12-07
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page