eCite Digital Repository

Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information

Citation

Pullinger, MG and Johnson, CJ, Maintaining or restoring connectivity of modified landscapes: evaluating the least-cost path model with multiple sources of ecological information, Landscape Ecology, 25, (10) pp. 1547-1560. ISSN 0921-2973 (2010) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
Restricted - Request a copy
878Kb
  

Copyright Statement

The original publication is available at http://www.springerlink.com

Official URL: http://www.springerlink.com

DOI: doi:10.1007/s10980-010-9526-6

Abstract

Habitat connectivity is an important element of functioning landscapes for mobile organisms. Maintenance or creation of movement corridors is one conservation strategy for reducing the negative effects of habitat fragmentation. Numerous spatial models exist to predict the location of movement corridors. Few studies, however, have investigated the effectiveness of these methods for predicting actual movement paths. We used an expert-based model and a resource selection function (RSF) to predict least-cost paths of woodland caribou. Using independent data for model evaluation, we found that the expert-based model was a poor predictor of long-distance animal movements; in comparison, the RSF model was effective at predicting habitat selection by caribou. We used the Path Deviation Index (PDI), cumulative path cost, and sinuosity to quantitatively compare the spatial differences between inferred caribou movement paths and predicted least-cost paths, and quasi-random null models of directional movement. Predicted movement paths were on average straighter than inferred movement paths for collared caribou. The PDI indicated that the least-cost paths were no better at predicting the inferred paths than either of two null models—straight line paths and randomly generated paths. We found statistically significant differences in cumulative cost scores for the main effects of model and path type; however, post-hoc comparisons were non-significant suggesting no difference among inferred, random, and predicted least cost paths. Paths generated from an expert based cost surface were more sinuous than those premised on the RSF model, but neither differed from the inferred path. Although our results are specific to one species, they highlight the importance of model evaluation when planning for habitat connectivity. We recommend that conservation planners adopt similar techniques when validating the effectiveness of movement corridors for other populations and species.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:animal movement, corridor, expert-based model, fragmentation, least-cost path, path deviation index
Research Division:Environmental Sciences
Research Group:Environmental Science and Management
Research Field:Conservation and Biodiversity
Objective Division:Environment
Objective Group:Ecosystem Assessment and Management
Objective Field:Ecosystem Assessment and Management at Regional or Larger Scales
Author:Pullinger, MG (Mr Michael Pullinger)
ID Code:65418
Year Published:2010
Web of Science® Times Cited:36
Deposited By:Geography and Environmental Studies
Deposited On:2010-11-12
Last Modified:2011-03-28
Downloads:1 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page