eCite Digital Repository
Comparison of tocilizumab monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: the AMBITION study
Citation
Jones, G and Sebba, A and Gu, J and Lowenstein, MB and Calvo, A and Gomez-Reino, JJ and Siri, DA and Tomsic, M and Alecock, E and Woodworth, T and Genovese, MC, Comparison of tocilizumab monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis: the AMBITION study , Annals of The Rheumatic Diseases: The Eular Journal, 69, (1) pp. 88-96. ISSN 0003-4967 (2010) [Refereed Article]
![]() | PDF Restricted - Request a copy 443Kb |
Copyright Statement
Copyright © 2010 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
DOI: doi:10.1136/ard.2008.105197
Abstract
Background: The anti-interleukin (IL) 6 receptor antibody
tocilizumab inhibits signalling of IL6, a key cytokine in
rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pathogenesis.
Objective: To evaluate through the AMBITION study the
efficacy and safety of tocilizumab monotherapy versus
methotrexate in patients with active RA for whom
previous treatment with methotrexate/biological agents
had not failed.
Methods: This 24-week, double-blind, double-dummy,
parallel-group study, randomised 673 patients to either
tocilizumab 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks, or methotrexate,
starting at 7.5 mg/week and titrated to 20 mg/week
within 8 weeks, or placebo for 8 weeks followed by
tocilizumab 8 mg/kg. The primary end point was the
proportion of patients achieving American College of
Rheumatology (ACR) 20 response at week 24.
Results: The intention-to-treat analysis demonstrated
that tocilizumab was better than methotrexate treatment
with a higher ACR20 response (69.9 vs 52.5%; p,0.001),
and 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) ,2.6 rate
(33.6 vs 12.1%) at week 24. Mean high-sensitivity Creactive
protein was within the normal range from week
12 with tocilizumab, whereas levels remained elevated
with methotrexate. The incidence of serious adverse
events with tocilizumab was 3.8% versus 2.8% with
methotrexate (p=0.50), and of serious infections, 1.4%
versus 0.7%, respectively. There was a higher incidence
of reversible grade 3 neutropenia (3.1% vs 0.4%) and
increased total cholesterol >240 mg/dl (13.2% vs 0.4%),
and a lower incidence of alanine aminotransferase
elevations .36–,56upper limit of normal (1.0% vs
2.5%), respectively.
Conclusion: Tocilizumab monotherapy is better than
methotrexate monotherapy, with rapid improvement in RA
signs and symptoms, and a favourable benefit–risk, in
patients for whom treatment with methotrexate or
biological agents has not previously failed.
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Research Division: | Biomedical and Clinical Sciences |
Research Group: | Clinical sciences |
Research Field: | Rheumatology and arthritis |
Objective Division: | Health |
Objective Group: | Clinical health |
Objective Field: | Clinical health not elsewhere classified |
UTAS Author: | Jones, G (Professor Graeme Jones) |
ID Code: | 64030 |
Year Published: | 2010 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 570 |
Deposited By: | Menzies Institute for Medical Research |
Deposited On: | 2010-06-17 |
Last Modified: | 2011-06-10 |
Downloads: | 3 View Download Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page