eCite Digital Repository

Selection of columns for GCxGC analysis of essential oils

Citation

Morrison, PD and Marriott, PJ and Poynter, SDH and Shellie, RA, Selection of columns for GCxGC analysis of essential oils, LC GC Europe, 23, (2) pp. 76-80. ISSN 1471-6577 (2010) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF (Part1)
Restricted - Request a copy
2Mb

Preview
PDF (Part2)
Restricted - Request a copy
2Mb

Preview
PDF
Restricted - Request a copy
468Kb
  

Copyright Statement

2010 Advanstar Communications, Inc.

Abstract

Multidimensional separations are performed by combining single analytical separation columns in such a way to greatly enhance peak capacity for the separation of complex multi-component samples. Comprehensive multidimensional gas chromatography (GC℅GC) employs largely independent first- and second-dimension separation mechanisms and typically generates peak capacity of the order of several thousand, making it a highly appropriate technology for the separation and analysis of complex multicomponent samples such as essential oils. A substantial majority of GC℅GC publications for essential oil analysis in the periodical literature have used a "non-polar" column in the first dimension and employed a "polar" column in the second dimension.1 In practice this almost always translates to use of a 100% polydimethylsiloxane or 5% diphenyl 95% dimethyl polysiloxane stationary phase in the first-dimension combined with a 50% diphenyl 50% dimethyl polysiloxane or a polyethylene glycol (wax) second-dimension column, although there are notable departures from this convention, including applications reversing the order of "polarity",2 providing class-type separation of citrus oil components and those using cyclodextrin derivative stationary phases for enantioselective analysis.3每6 Even in the case where a conventional non-polar/polar column ensemble is used, the mechanism of retention for solutes in the second dimension depends on volatility and polarity, but using an appropriate temperature programme cancels out the influence of volatility on retention in the second dimension column.7 Thus, GC℅GC separations are temperature-programmed to maximize differences in separation mechanisms in the two dimensions. However, because both columns are commonly installed in the same oven, the temperature stability of one of the separation columns typically imparts an upper temperature limit on the separation system. Applications that use 50% diphenyl 50% dimethyl polysiloxane second dimension columns are benefited in terms of high-temperature stability compared with those applications employing wax columns, but more suitable selectivity of wax columns for polar essential oil components was shown many years ago and wax stationary phases are almost universally preferred.8 Recently, we received a 5 m ℅ 100 米m i.d. MEGA-WAX HT high-temperature wax column with a stationary phase film thickness of 0.10 米m (Mega, Legnano, Italy) and have been using this column for our GC℅GC work involving essential oils analysis. The wax second dimension column used in the current investigation has more than 9000 N/m tested in isothermal mode and an upper column oven limit of 300 ∼C. Results from the GC℅GC analysis of kunzea essential oil obtained by steam distillation of aerial parts of Kunzea ambigua are reported here.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Chemical Sciences
Research Group:Analytical Chemistry
Research Field:Separation Science
Objective Division:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Field:Expanding Knowledge in the Chemical Sciences
Author:Poynter, SDH (Mr Sam Poynter)
Author:Shellie, RA (Associate Professor Robert Shellie)
ID Code:63182
Year Published:2010
Funding Support:Australian Research Council (DP0771893)
Web of Science® Times Cited:3
Deposited By:Austn Centre for Research in Separation Science
Deposited On:2010-04-19
Last Modified:2014-10-14
Downloads:3 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page