eCite Digital Repository
Effect of intradialytic versus home-based aerobic exercise training on physical function and vascular parameters in hemodialysis patients: A randomized pilot study
Citation
Koh, KP and Fassett, RG and Sharman, JE and Coombes, JS and Williams, AD, Effect of intradialytic versus home-based aerobic exercise training on physical function and vascular parameters in hemodialysis patients: A randomized pilot study, American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 55, (1) pp. 88-99. ISSN 0272-6386 (2010) [Refereed Article]
![]() | PDF Restricted - Request a copy 507Kb |
Copyright Statement
The definitive version is available at http://www.sciencedirect.com
DOI: doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2009.09.025
Abstract
Background
Hemodialysis patients show reduced physical function and greater risk of increased arterial stiffness because of hypertension, metabolic disturbances, and vascular calcification. Exercise interventions potentially could improve their vascular risk profile.
Study Design
Randomized controlled pilot clinical study comparing the effects of 6 months of supervised intradialytic exercise training versus home-based exercise training or usual care on physical function and arterial stiffness in hemodialysis patients.
Setting & Participants
70 hemodialysis patients from 3 renal units.
Intervention
Intradialytic-exercise patients trained 3 times/wk for 6 months on a cycle ergometer and home-based-exercise patients followed a walking program to achieve the same weekly physical activity. Usual-care patients received no specific intervention.
Outcomes & Measurements
Primary outcome measures were distance traveled during a 6-minute walk test and aortic pulse wave velocity. Secondary outcome measures included augmentation index (augmentation pressure as a percentage of central pulse pressure), peripheral (brachial) and central blood pressures (measured noninvasively using radial tonometry), physical activity, and self-reported physical functioning. Measurements were made at baseline and 6 months.
Results
At 6 months, there were no significant differences between changes in 6-minute walk test distance (intradialytic exercise, +14%; home-based exercise, +11%; usual care, +5%), pulse wave velocity (intradialytic exercise, −4%; home-based exercise, −2%; usual care, +5%), or any secondary outcome measure.
Limitations
Lack of medication data limited the analysis of vascular parameters in this study.
Conclusion
There were no differences between intradialytic or home-based exercise training and usual care for either physical function or vascular parameters
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Hemodialysis; exercise prescription; physical function; arterial health |
Research Division: | Health Sciences |
Research Group: | Sports science and exercise |
Research Field: | Exercise physiology |
Objective Division: | Health |
Objective Group: | Clinical health |
Objective Field: | Clinical health not elsewhere classified |
UTAS Author: | Koh, KP (Ms Kirsten Koh) |
UTAS Author: | Sharman, JE (Professor James Sharman) |
UTAS Author: | Williams, AD (Associate Professor Andrew Williams) |
ID Code: | 60203 |
Year Published: | 2010 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 129 |
Deposited By: | Health Sciences A |
Deposited On: | 2010-01-20 |
Last Modified: | 2011-05-16 |
Downloads: | 5 View Download Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page