File(s) under permanent embargo
Response
Polarised choices have been a recurrent feature of environmental debate in Australia and other Englishspeaking “New World” societies: either development or environment. The countercultural environmentalists of the 1960s and ’70s viewed nature as locked in battle with society, ecology as pitted against technology, wilderness as the antithesis of the city. The field of environmental ethics that emerged at this time reflected these binary distinctions in a stark moral choice between modern anthropocentrism (human-centred ethics) or environmentalist ecocentrism (nature-centred ethics).
History
Publication title
Journal of Bioethical InquiryVolume
6Issue
4Pagination
525-526ISSN
1176-7529Department/School
School of Geography, Planning and Spatial SciencesPublisher
SpringerPlace of publication
NetherlandsRights statement
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comRepository Status
- Restricted