Preview

PDF Restricted - Request a copy 405Kb

This paper considers the legislative debates in Australia that led to the passage of the Research Involving Human Embryos Act (Cth 2002) and the Prohibition of Human Cloning Act (Cth 2002). In the first part of the paper, we discuss the debate surrounding the legislation with particular emphasis on the ways in which demands for public consultation, public debate and the education of Australians about the potential ethical and scientific impact of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) research were deployed, and the explicit and implicit framing of the scope of public consultation. We then ask whether, given the calls for public consultations, debate and understanding, current work in democratic theory could be helpful in analysing the process of policy-making in these areas. In particular, we canvass the literature relating to aggregative and deliberative models of democracy for processes that support the legitimacy of policy. We identify features of the debate that reflect the appeal of deliberative approaches as well as some of the possible hurdles or limitations to developing deliberative democratic approaches to policy in ethically contentious areas.

Item Type:	Refereed Article
Keywords:	Stem cell transplantation - Bioethics - Embryo research - Public policy
Research Division:	Philosophy and Religious Studies
Research Group:	Applied ethics
Research Field:	Bioethics
Objective Division:	Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:	Expanding knowledge
Objective Field:	Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies
UTAS Author:	Dodds, SM (Professor Susan Dodds)
ID Code:	58768
Year Published:	2006
Deposited By:	Philosophy
Deposited On:	2009-10-27
Last Modified:	2010-05-25
Downloads:	0