File(s) under permanent embargo
Conversations between judges and children: An argument in favour of judicial conferences in contested children's matters
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-16, 23:52 authored by Fernando, MMThis article discusses the infrequent practice of judges speaking directly with children, or 'judicial conferencing'. It is argued that there are good reasons why judges should speak with children. Children have a right to be heard in proceedings affecting them, and many express they want to be involved. Judges, in making decisions, must take children's views into account. Judicial conferencing allows children's views to be presented without filtering by third parties, ensuring informed decisions are made on the best available evidence. The results will be to empower children in a situation where they otherwise have very little input and control, and to promote decisions which are truly in children's best interests. While the flexibility created by the Less Adversarial Trial is ideal for increased judicial interaction with children, any actual increase will require an attitudinal shift on the part of many judges who are reluctant to embrace the practice.
History
Publication title
Australian Journal of Family LawVolume
23Pagination
48-70ISSN
0817-623XDepartment/School
Faculty of LawPublisher
Reed International BooksPlace of publication
ChatswoodRights statement
Copyright 2009 LexisNexisRepository Status
- Restricted