Medical organizations responsible for assessing the clinical competence of large numbers of examinees have traditionally used written, oral, and observation-based examination methods. The results from these examinations form the basis for major professional decisions regarding promotion or privileges of medical students or physicians. In this article, we present a set of guidelines that examining bodies should follow in developing and implementing assessment procedures that are a valid reflection of examinees’ current level of competence and of their ability to perform satisfactorily at the next stage of training or practice. The guidelines are based on our collective experiences as well as the growing literature on assessment of clinical competence. The discussion covers issues that have not been fully addressed in previously published reviews, including identifying the competencies to be tested, selecting appropriate and realistic test methods, dealing with test administration and scoring, and setting standards for the desired level of performance. © 1994, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved.

Item Type:	Refereed Article
Research Division:	Medical and Health Sciences
Research Group:	Other Medical and Health Sciences
Research Field:	Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:	Education and Training
Objective Group:	Other Education and Training
Objective Field:	Education and Training not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:	Thomson, AN (Professor Alex Thomson)
ID Code:	5479
Year Published:	1994
Deposited By:	General Practice
Deposited On:	1995-08-01
Last Modified:	2011-08-26
Downloads:	0