eCite Digital Repository

Assessing Cost-Effectiveness - Mental Health. Introduction to the study and methods


Haby, M and Carter, R and Mihalopoulos, C and Magnus, A and Sanderson, Kristy and Andrews, G and Vos, T, Assessing Cost-Effectiveness - Mental Health. Introduction to the study and methods, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 38, (8) pp. 569-578. ISSN 0004-8674 (2004) [Refereed Article]

DOI: doi:10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01420.x


Objective: The Assessing Cost-Effectiveness - Mental Health (ACE-MH) study aims to assess from a health sector perspective, whether there are options for change that could improve the effectiveness and efficiency of Australia's current mental health services by directing available resources toward 'best practice' cost-effective services. Method: The use of standardized evaluation methods addresses the reservations expressed by many economists about the simplistic use of League Tables based on economic studies confounded by differences in methods, context and setting. The cost-effectiveness ratio for each intervention is calculated using economic and epidemiological data. This includes systematic reviews and randomised controlled trials for efficacy, the Australian Surveys of Mental Health and Wellbeing for current practice and a combination of trials and longitudinal studies for adherence. The cost-effectiveness ratios are presented as cost (A$ per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) saved with a 95% uncertainty interval based on Monte Carlo simulation modelling. An assessment of interventions on 'second filter' criteria ('equity', 'strength of evidence', 'feasibility' and 'acceptability to stakeholders') allows broader concepts of 'benefit' to be taken into account, as well as factors that might influence policy judgements in addition to cost-effectiveness ratios. Conclusions: The main limitation of the study is in the translation of the effect size from trials into a change in the DALY disability weight, which required the use of newly developed methods. While comparisons within disorders are valid, comparisons across disorders should be made with caution. A series of articles is planned to present the results.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Commerce, Management, Tourism and Services
Research Group:Human resources and industrial relations
Research Field:Occupational and workplace health and safety
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Public health (excl. specific population health)
Objective Field:Mental health
UTAS Author:Sanderson, Kristy (Associate Professor Kristy Sanderson)
ID Code:48547
Year Published:2004
Web of Science® Times Cited:39
Deposited By:Menzies Institute for Medical Research
Deposited On:2007-10-29
Last Modified:2011-09-22

Repository Staff Only: item control page