eCite Digital Repository
To lose both would look like carelessness: Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour Disease
Citation
McCallum, HI and Jones, ME, To lose both would look like carelessness: Tasmanian Devil Facial Tumour Disease, Public Library of Science Biology, 4, (10) pp. 1671-1674. ISSN 1545-7885 (2006) [Refereed Article]
![]() | PDF 201Kb |
Copyright Statement
© 2006 McCallum and Jones. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
DOI: doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040342
Abstract
At the time of European settlement, Tasmania was the
last remaining refuge of the two largest marsupial
carnivores: the thylacine (or Tasmanian tiger),
Thylacinus cynocephalus, and the Tasmanian devil, Sarcophilus
harrisii. The extinction of the thylacine is perhaps the most
notorious of the many Australian mammal extinctions since
European colonisation. It has been partially blamed on
disease [1], although there is little hard evidence to support
this idea [2]. In 1996, Tasmanian devils were photographed
in northeast Tasmania with what were apparently large
tumours on their faces [3] (Figure 1). Sporadic reports
continued during the next fi ve years. By 2005, the tumours
were occurring on more than half of the range of the species,
and associated with substantial population declines. Following
concerns that the disease might cause the extinction of the
devil, the species has recently been listed as vulnerable to
extinction at state and national levels. In the words Oscar
Wilde put into Lady Bracknell’s mouth, to lose one large
marsupial carnivore may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose
both would look like carelessness.
This paper uses the Tasmanian devil facial tumour disease
(DFTD) as a case study of the wider issue of how to manage
an emerging disease threat that poses a serious conservation
threat: how should you proceed when you know very little?
This is a question common to many ecological problems;
all environmental management operates in the face of
uncertainty [4]. If actions are postponed until higher-quality
information is available, then it is likely that substantial costs
will be incurred. Further, with emerging diseases or invasive
species in general, it is likely that control will become more
diffi cult or indeed impossible once the agent becomes
established [5]. Rapid action is therefore essential but will
inevitably be based on incomplete knowledge.
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Research Division: | Environmental Sciences |
Research Group: | Environmental management |
Research Field: | Conservation and biodiversity |
Objective Division: | Environmental Management |
Objective Group: | Other environmental management |
Objective Field: | Other environmental management not elsewhere classified |
UTAS Author: | McCallum, HI (Professor Hamish McCallum) |
UTAS Author: | Jones, ME (Professor Menna Jones) |
ID Code: | 43245 |
Year Published: | 2006 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 64 |
Deposited By: | Zoology |
Deposited On: | 2006-08-01 |
Last Modified: | 2017-01-24 |
Downloads: | 707 View Download Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page