eCite Digital Repository
Comparison of content policies for institutional repositories in Australia
Citation
Sale, AHJ, Comparison of content policies for institutional repositories in Australia, First Monday, 11, (4) pp. EJ4. ISSN 1396-0466 (2006) [Refereed Article]
 | PDF 291Kb |
Copyright Statement
Licenced under Creative Commons Attribution (CC)Public Domain http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
Official URL: http://www.firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/i...
DOI: doi:10.5210/fm.v11i4.1324
Abstract
Seven Australian universities have established institutional repositories (containing research articles, also known as eprints) that can be analyzed for content and which were in operation during 2004 and 2005. This short paper analyses their content and shows that a requirement to deposit research output into a repository coupled with effective author support policies works in Australia and delivers high levels of content. Voluntary deposit policies do not, regardless of any author support by the university. This is consistent with international data.
Item Details
| Item Type: | Refereed Article |
|---|---|
| Research Division: | Information and Computing Sciences |
| Research Group: | Distributed computing and systems software |
| Research Field: | Service oriented computing |
| Objective Division: | Information and Communication Services |
| Objective Group: | Information systems, technologies and services |
| Objective Field: | Information systems, technologies and services not elsewhere classified |
| UTAS Author: | Sale, AHJ (Professor Arthur Sale) |
| ID Code: | 39562 |
| Year Published: | 2006 |
| Deposited By: | Computing |
| Deposited On: | 2006-08-01 |
| Last Modified: | 2012-11-06 |
| Downloads: | 356 View Download Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page