eCite Digital Repository

Habituality of Undecidability, A Comparison of Merleau-Ponty of Derrida on the Decision


Reynolds, J, Habituality of Undecidability, A Comparison of Merleau-Ponty of Derrida on the Decision , International Journal of Philosophical Studies , 10, (4) pp. 449-466. ISSN 0967-2559 (2002) [Refereed Article]

DOI: doi:10.1080/09672550210167423


This essay examines the relationship that obtains between Merleau-Ponty and Derrida through exploring an interesting point of dissension in their respective accounts of decision-making. Merleau-Ponty's early philosophy emphasizes the body-subject's tendency to seek an equilibrium with the world (by acquiring skills and establishing what he refers to as 'intentional arcs'), and towards deciding in an embodied and habitual manner that minimizes any confrontation with what might be termed a decision-making aporia. On the other hand, in his later writings, Derrida frequently points towards a constitutive 'undecidability' involved in decision-making. He insists that a decision, if it is genuinely to be a decision, must involve a leap beyond all prior preparations, and this ensures that an aporia surrounds any attempt to decide. One must always decide without any equilibrium or stability, and yet these are precisely the things that Merleau-Ponty claims that our body moves us towards. Most of this essay will explore the significance of this disparity, and it will be argued that many of Merleau-Ponty's insights challenge the Derridean conception of the undecidability involved in decision-making. This becomes most obvious when comparing the decision-making processes of those expert in a particular field to those who are merely competent (for example chess), and this essay will attempt to establish that the aporia that Derrida discerns can actually be seen to constrict. © 2002 Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Philosophy and Religious Studies
Research Group:Philosophy
Research Field:Philosophy of specific cultures (incl. comparative philosophy)
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:International relations
Objective Field:International organisations
UTAS Author:Reynolds, J (Professor Jack Reynolds)
ID Code:34220
Year Published:2002
Web of Science® Times Cited:8
Deposited By:Philosophy
Deposited On:2005-07-26
Last Modified:2005-07-26

Repository Staff Only: item control page