The recent articles by F. Mechsner (2004) and his colleagues (F. Mechsner, D. Kerzel, G. Knoblich, & W. Prinz, 2001) have once again fuelled the cognition vs. motor debate. In this commentary, the author takes an historical perspective and argues that Mechsner's stance represents just another phase in this continuing dialogue. Finally, the value of such false dichotomies in the progress of the field is questioned.

Item Type:	Refereed Article
Research Division:	Health Sciences
Research Group:	Sports science and exercise
Research Field:	Sports science and exercise not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:	Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:	Expanding knowledge
Objective Field:	Expanding knowledge in the physical sciences
UTAS Author:	Summers, JJ (Professor Jeffery Summers)
ID Code:	30562
Year Published:	2004
Web of Science® Times Cited:	3
Deposited By:	Psychology
Deposited On:	2004-08-01
Last Modified:	2005-04-27
Downloads:	0