eCite Digital Repository

Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the near-patient testing CoaguChek S international normalised ratio monitor in rural medical practice

Citation

Jackson, SL and Bereznicki, LRE and Peterson, GM and Marsden, KA and Jupe, DML and Vial, JH and Rasiah, RL and Misan, G and Williams, SM, Accuracy and clinical usefulness of the near-patient testing CoaguChek S international normalised ratio monitor in rural medical practice, Australian Journal of Rural Health, 12, (4) pp. 137-142. ISSN 1038-5282 (2004) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
Restricted - Request a copy
288Kb
  

Copyright Statement

The definitive published version is available online at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com

Official URL: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com

DOI: doi:10.1111/j.1440-1854.2004.00585.x

Abstract

Objective: To compare the accuracy and clinical usefulness of the near-patient testing CoaguChek S INR monitor in rural medical practice. Design, setting and main outcome measures: General practices were identified through Australian university departments of rural health. Study investigators trained general practitioners and/or practice nurses in the use of the CoaguChek S INR monitor. General practices obtained a fingerprick sample for testing with the INR monitor to compare with conventional pathology testing for accuracy. An evaluation questionnaire was administered to users of the machine to assess ease of use and clinical usefulness. Results: A total of 169 patients from 15 general practice sites provided 401 paired (CoaguChek S and laboratory) INR results. The CoaguChek S was found to be accurate when compared to laboratory INR (r = 0.89), despite complicating variables such as multiple users of the monitor and multiple laboratories used for comparison with the CoaguChek S INR. Overall, 88% of dual INR measurements were within 0.5 INR units of each other. For laboratory INR 1.9, 2.0C3.5 and 3.6, 97%, 90% and 57% of readings were within 0.5 INR units, respectively. Clinical agreement occurred 93% and 90% of the time against published expanded and narrow criteria, respectively. Conclusions: The routine use of near-patient testing, with appropriate training and quality assurance programs, has the potential to increase the safety and efficacy of warfarin therapy in rural and remote communities. What is already known on this subject? : There is clear evidence of the under use of warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and the under-use is greatest in rural areas. One of the barriers to the use of warfarin in these areas is the relative lack of access to pathology services for regular international normalised ratio (INR) testing What does this study add? : This study demonstrates that the performance of the CoaguChek S INR monitor in the rural general practice setting was excellent. Our results indicate that the CoaguChek S INR monitor has the potential to lead to safer and more effective use of warfarin and therefore to better management of anticoagulated patients in rural and remote areas

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:general practice;near-patient testing;point-of-care;rural;warfarin
Research Division:Medical and Health Sciences
Research Group:Public Health and Health Services
Research Field:Health and Community Services
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Specific Population Health (excl. Indigenous Health)
Objective Field:Rural Health
Author:Jackson, SL (Dr Shane Jackson)
Author:Bereznicki, LRE (Associate Professor Luke Bereznicki)
Author:Peterson, GM (Professor Gregory Peterson)
Author:Marsden, KA (Dr Katherine Marsden)
Author:Vial, JH (Associate Professor Janet Vial)
ID Code:30002
Year Published:2004
Deposited By:Pharmacy
Deposited On:2004-08-01
Last Modified:2011-05-23
Downloads:2 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page