eCite Digital Repository

Indefeasibility and mistake - the utilitarianism of Torrens

Citation

Griggs, LD, Indefeasibility and mistake - the utilitarianism of Torrens, Australian Property Law Journal, 10, (2) pp. 108-119. ISSN 1038-5959 (2003) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
Restricted - Request a copy
209Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2003 LexisNexis

Official URL: http://www.lexisnexis.com.au

Abstract

In Lukacs v Wood ((1978) 19 SASR 520) and Tutt v Doyle ((1997) 42 NSWLR 10) it was accepted that rectification could form the basis of a personal equity sufficient to establish an in personam claim. However, there are a number of cases (Medical Benefits Fund of Australia Ltd v Fisher [1984J 1 Qd R 606; State Bank of New South Wales v Berowra Waters Holdings Ply Ltd [1986J 4 NSWLR 398 and Tanzone Ply Ltd v Westpac Banking Corp (1999) 9 BPR 17,287; NSW ConvR 55-908) where the plaintiffs were no 'less deserving of protection, but indefeasibility prevailed over any possible equity. This article examines these cases and finds that there is no convincing reason for the differences. What this reiterates is that while the Torrens system of land registration will operate for the benefit of most, in some instances innocent people will suffer. This reinforcing the utilitarian focus of title by registration.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Law and Legal Studies
Research Group:Law
Research Field:Law not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:Justice and the Law
Objective Field:Justice and the Law not elsewhere classified
Author:Griggs, LD (Mr Lynden Griggs)
ID Code:26920
Year Published:2003
Deposited By:Law
Deposited On:2003-08-01
Last Modified:2009-07-20
Downloads:13 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page