eCite Digital Repository

Are qualitative methods misunderstood?

Citation

Ezzy, D, Are qualitative methods misunderstood?, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 25, (4) pp. 294-297. ISSN 1326-0200 (2001) [Refereed Article]

DOI: doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.2001.tb00582.x

Abstract

Qualitative research methods are increasingly utilised by health researchers. Along with this the criteria for assessing the quality of qualitative research are changing from a natural science model to an interpretative social science model. This is a product of the realisation by health researchers that qualitative methods utilise a different epistemology to statistical methods. I demonstrate that a recent article in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health draws on a now outdated natural science methodology of assessing bias in focus groups. Drawing on interpretativist social science theory and recent work in the British Medical Journal. I argue for the importance of examining the social contexts through which qualitative data is produced.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Research Division:Medical and Health Sciences
Research Group:Public Health and Health Services
Research Field:Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Other Health
Objective Field:Health not elsewhere classified
Author:Ezzy, D (Professor Douglas Ezzy)
ID Code:21187
Year Published:2001
Web of Science® Times Cited:15
Deposited By:Sociology and Social Work
Deposited On:2001-08-01
Last Modified:2002-05-21
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page