File(s) not publicly available
Fitch's Proof, Verificationism and the Knower Paradox
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-16, 12:35 authored by Beall, JI have argued that without an adequate solution to the knower paradox Fitch's Proof is- or at least ought to be-ineffective against verificationism. Of course, in order to follow my suggestion verificationists must maintain that there is currently no adequate solution to the knower paradox, and that the paradox continues to provide prima facie evidence of inconsistent knowledge. By my lights, any glimpse at the literature on paradoxes offers strong support for the first thesis, and any honest, non-dogmatic reflection on the knower paradox provides strong support for the second. Whether verificationists want to go the route I've suggested is not for me todecide. As in the previous section my aim has been that of defending the mere viability of verificationism in the face of what many, many philosophers have taken to be its death-knell, namely Fitch's Proof. But, as the final objection makes clear, showing that verificationism can live in the face of Fitch's Proof is one thing; showing that it should live is another project. If nothing else, I hope that this papershows that verificationists still have a project to pursue; Fitch's Proof, contrary to popular opinion, need not bury verificationism.13.
History
Publication title
The Australasian Journal of PhilosophyVolume
78Issue
No 2Pagination
241-247ISSN
0004-8402Department/School
School of HumanitiesPublisher
Oxford University PressPlace of publication
UKRepository Status
- Restricted